Before the Court Modelama's reply to the Claim Application under the Minimum Wages Act 1948

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3216

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Action Research Associates and Gurgaon Shramik Kendra	-
dc.date.accessioned	2022-09-21T05:31:46Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-09-21T05:31:46Z	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3216	-
dc.description	The management contested the employment period as initially she was on probation, and denied paying wages below the minimum standard and charged worker's application as harassment. Annexure A provides wages details which are higher than the minimum wage scale.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	The management rejected the claim as it did not name the company correctly, it did not follow the correct format, and appealed to reject it as malicious.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.subject	Application	en_US
dc.subject	Minimum Wages	en_US
dc.subject	Harassment	en_US
dc.title	Before the Court Modelama's reply to the Claim Application under the Minimum Wages Act 1948	en_US
dc.type	Case Proceeding	en_US
dc.description.host	Archives of Indian Labour [V.V. Giri National Labour Institute (VVGNLI) - Association of Indian Labour Historians (AILH)]	en_US
dc.description.dis	“All content hosted in this archive has been obtained with prior permission and approval from the institutions, organisations, and individuals who have either published/produced or held these materials as part of their collections. These materials are meant for educational, research and for non-commercial use only.”	en_US
dc.page	9	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Case 15: Modelama Exports: Wages and Dismissal

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
Before_the_Court_Modelama_Reply_to_the_Claim_Application_under_the_MW_Act_1948.pdf		5.02 MB	Adobe PDF	Preview PDF Download

Archives of Indian Labour